lohud.com

Sponsored by:

Beyond Borders

A blog about immigration in the New York region

More on immigration, from NY’s incoming senator

January
26

Kirsten Gillibrand spoke in more detail about her immigration stance in an interview with New York 1. The incoming senator makes clear that she wants to provide more ways for agricultural workers to come to the United States legally, and for family members of immigrants to get visas without such long delays. Her position is still very different from that of Sen. Chuck Schumer or Hillary Clinton, starting with her use of the touchy word “amnesty.”

“I think amnesty is the wrong approach,” she said. Gillibrand, who will be sworn in tomorrow, described two specific things she wanted to do: clear the backlogs for family-sponsored immigration down to one year or less; and offer five-year visas for agricultural workers that could eventually lead to U.S. citizenship. (This sounds like an entirely new kind of visa; the existing H-2A agricultural visas are strictly temporary, without a path to citizenship.) She objected to past proposals that would have workers return to their home country to renew a visa. Those workers would be unlikely to go home, she said, and would only create a new pool of illegal immigrants after two years.

She was not asked the big, dicey question of what should be done with regard to the estimated 12 million undocumented people in the United States. Certainly “amnesty” is out, and I take that as a rejection of any “earned legalization” — the idea, twice rejected in the Senate, of setting up a series of legal hoops for undocumented immigrants to jump through in return for legal status. (The word amnesty, suggesting an outright giveaway, has long been abandoned by politicians who favor a comprehensive overhaul.)

Anyway, her position clearly has supporters, despite the criticism from groups like the New York Immigration Coalition. Along with receiving comments on this blog, I just took a call from a woman in Ohio who saw our story yesterday in The Journal News. Any notion of granting legal status to illegal immigrants is unfair and wrong, and there’s no way around that, she said.

“There’s nothing good about illegals living in our communities. We’re suffering. We’re going without work,” she said. “In no way does illegal immigration benefit the average American.”

This entry was posted on Monday, January 26th, 2009 at 5:28 pm by Leah Rae.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Print This Post | Email This Post

Advertisement

One Response to “More on immigration, from NY’s incoming senator”

  1. Ed Kowalski

    In his first five years, Bush himself admitted, 6 million aliens were arrested at the border, breaking into this country. One in 12—500,000—had criminal records. Is it anti-immigrant to demand a halt to this invasion, even if it means troops on the border? Is it truly compassionate, or an act of cravenness, to insist that the answer is amnesty for 12 million to 20 million illegals and absolution for the businesses that hired them?
    leah, when are you going to get it? It’s about the abrogation of law. Focus your efforts against the individuals, businesses and politicians who create this problem and cheat honest business owners and workers by allowing illegal hiring practices under the table. In short, make the issue about enforcement of the law, cost and corruption. Seems to me that this would be resposible journalism.

    Ed Kowalski
    9/11 Families For A Secure America

Leave a Reply

Advertisement
About this blog
Reporters from The Journal News track the latest developments in immigration. Beyond Borders explores the news, the cultures and controversies.
About the authors


Coming to America: What were the laws when your ancestor came?


Links

LOCAL LINKS


POLICY/MEDIA


ADVOCACY/OPINION


BLOGS


GOVERNMENT


Other recent entries

Recently Updated LoHud Blogs
Monthly Archives

Bad Behavior has blocked 672 access attempts in the last 7 days.