An alert for fraud in immigration services, and questions about fingerprints
- December
- 5
U.S. immigration officials reached a settlement with a group of immigrants who tried to qualify for the 1986 amnesty, bringing an end to the last of three lawsuits stemming from that law.
It’s times like this when unscrupulous people put out fraudulent offers for immigration services, says Andrea Quarantillo, director of the New York district office of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (The district office is at 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan, with a satellite location in Garden City, Long Island.) Ads for a “new amnesty” are circulating, she said, even though there is no such thing.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of immigrants who were unfairly denied amnesty under the old law or never received an answer.
How to avoid an unscrupulous immigration lawyer or business person?
Click here to check the list of “disciplined practitioners” at DOJ.
To find a referral, AILA has directory of immigration attorneys, and so does the New York State Bar Association.
Quarantillo made the remarks during her discussion at Pace Law School this week. She was invited by the Immigration Justice Clinic at Pace, which serves indigent clients in the region. Most of the discussion was about the latest efforts to make USCIS more efficient. There were many questions about the complex rules and procedures.
Vanessa Merton, the clinic’s faculty supervisor, had a chance to raise an issue that she finds particularly baffling: Why do applicants have to submit a new set of fingerprints — making an appointment in New Rochelle, paying an $80 fee and taking more time from government employees — with each major application?
Read on for the answer, which didn’t seem to satisfy anyone, including Quarantillo. Until USCIS gets its electronic filing system, it doesn’t have the ability to store and receive a person’s prints. “I don’t like it any better than you do, I think it’s a total waste of time, but I am telling you that’s the answer,” she said.
Read more of this entry »















